One World Government
Document 39.6....08 April 2001..Get US out of the UN....
12 good reasons to do so NOW...
More and more Americans are coming to the chilling realization that U.S.
membership in the United Nations poses a very real threat to our survival as
a free and independent nation. Here are some good reasons to be concerned:
1..The UN’s basic philosophy is both Anti-American and Pro-Totalitarian.
Our Declaration of Independence proclaims the “self-evident” truth
“men....are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights.” But,
in its Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the UN ignores God’s
existence, implies that it grants rights, and then repeatedly claims power
“as provided by law” to cancel them out of existence. If any government can
place restrictions on such fundamental rights as freedom of speech [as the
European Union did last week when it outlawed and made it a criminal offence
to criticize any element of the EU Government in any manner], the right to
keep and bear arms, freedoms of the press, association, movement, and
religion, soon there will be no such freedoms.
2..The UN was founded by Communists and Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)
members whose common goal was a socialist world government. Sixteen key
U.S. Officials who shaped the policies leading to the creation of the U. N.
were later exposed in sworn testimony as secret Communists including Sec of
State Dean Acheson, and many other key State Dept officials! These also
included Alger Hiss, chief planner of the 1945 founding conference, and the
Asst Sec of Treasury, Harry Dexter White. The Soviet Union under Stalin and
the entire Communist Party USA apparatus worked tirelessly to launch the UN.
They wrote the entire charter and operational guidelines for each and every
department thereof. Since its beginning in 1921, [it was organized and
established in 1917 in Paris] the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) has
always worked for world government. The Key CFR founder, Edward Mandell
House, the key confidant and right hand of President Woodrow Wilson (who
himself envisioned himself as the First President of the World Government),
in his book, Philip Dru: Administrator, called for socialism as dreamed of
by Karl Marx...” The CFR was an early promoter of the UN, and 43 members of
the US delegation at the UN founding conference were or would become CFR
members.
3..The UN has always chosen socialist one-worlders for leaders. The
Secretary-General at the UN founding conference was Soviet spy Alger Hiss.
He was followed as Secretary-General by Norwegian socialist Trygve Lie,
Swedish socialist Dag Hammarskjold, Burmese Marxist U Thant, Austrian former
Nazi, Kurt Waldheim, Peruvian socialist Javier Perez de-Cuellar, Egyptian
socialist Boutros Boutros-Ghali, Kofi Annan of Ghana. Each has consistently
used the full resources of the UN to promote Communist and Socialist causes
around the world. The Socialist International (which proudly traces its
origins to the First International headed by Karl Marx) today claims tens of
millions of members in 54 countries. At its 1962 Congress, it declared: “The
ultimate objective of the parties of the Socialist International is nothing
less than world government...Membership of [in] the United Nations must be
made universal...” Almost all of the UN’s “independent” commissions for the
last thirty years have been headed by members of the Socialist
International.
4..The UN seeks power to control the environment, population,
children...the world. Both the 1972 UN Environmental Program and the 1992
UN Conference on Environment and Development laid plans to whip up
widespread environmental concerns (some exaggerated, many complete lies).
These concerns would then be used as justification for increasing UN
authority on environmental issues. The statements and publications of these
UN programs leave little doubt that their goal is a world government with
the power to cancel national sovereignty, regulate economic activity, and
control the human race—all, of course, under the banner of “protecting the
environment.” In late 1994, UN planners meeting in Egypt approved a
20–year, $17 billion plan to “stabilize” the world’s population. The UN’s
goal is to reduce population selectively by encouraging abortion,
sterilization, and controlled human breeding. The UN Convention on the
Rights of the Child also claims power not only to grant rights but also to
cancel them “as provided by law.” It claims that governments must guarantee
children “freedom of expression...freedom to seek, receive, and impart
information...freedom of thought, conscience, and religion,” regardless of
the wishes of their parents.
5..The UN Charter outlines the path to world tyranny. After giving lip
service about not intervening “in matters which are essentially within the
domestic jurisdiction of any state...,” the UN Charter continues, “but this
principle shall not prejudice the application of enforcement measures under
Chapter VII.” Chapter VII discusses sanctions and boycotts, but if these
are decided to “be inadequate, it may take such action by air, sea, or land
forces as may be necessary to maintain or restore international peace and
security.” The UN used this broad assertion of authority as the pretext for
its armed intervention in the domestic turmoil, in Somalia, Haiti, Rwanda,
Bosnia, Montenegro, Hertzegovina, and others.
6..The UN is building its own army to enforce its will. In 1992, UN
Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali, fulfilling a directive from the UN
Security Council, unveiled An Agenda for Peace, a plan to strengthen UN
“peacekeeping” capabilities. The plan calls for armed forces to be made
available to the UN “on a permanent basis.” It ominously warns, “The time of
absolute and exclusive sovereignty has passed” and proceeds to name a long
list of “risks for stability” that would justify use of the “permanent” UN
army to enforce its will. Consider also that Choi Young-Jin, Assistant
Secretary-General for Peacekeeping Planning and Support, called for a
“stand-by” UN army that would be an “interim measure” on the path to a real
standing army, something Young-Jin hopes to personally “contribute to
establishing...over the mid and long–term.” The Komrade Klinton
administration contributed $200,000 in seed money to the UN September 1997
in support of the “standby army” initiative. Incredibly, U. S. Leaders are
using America’s military to pave the way for this UN army! In Bosnia,
Somalia, Haiti, and elsewhere, foreign UN commanders have controlled our
troops. When 15 Americans were killed over Iraq in mid-1994, Vice-President
Gore extended condolences “to the families of those who died in the service
of the United Nations.” Even more incredibly, it has been the official
policy of the U.S. government since 1961 to disarm America and create a UN
army. {See my documents # 23.1, 23.2, & 23.3 which describes the State Dept
Documents establishing the disarmament and dismemberment of our military
forces}. This policy concludes: “progressive controlled disarmament would
proceed to the point where no nation would have the military power to
challenge the progressively strengthened UN Peace Force. {See State dept Pub
7277: Freedom From War.}
7..The UN doesn’t settle disputes—it makes them worse! Our ambassador to
the UN in 1982, although a UN supporter, admitted, “The UN has become an
arena in which countries are drawn into problems they might never have
become involved in.” Ask yourself: Should Seychelles or Benin or Guyana, or
Barbados have to take sides in a clash that breaks out on the opposite side
of the world? When centuries-old hatreds erupt in the former Yugoslavia, why
does the UN inject its presence with troops, blockades, bombings, and a
parade of speeches? American troops serving as globocops for the UN become
targets for criminals and terrorists. In 1983, 239 U.S. Marines were blown
to bits at the Beirut airport. Five years later, U.S. Marine Lt Col William
Higgins was kidnapped and eventually murdered by Arab terrorists while in a
UN unit in Lebanon (he was unarmed–as required by the UN). The UN
“peacekeeping mission” in Somalia cost the lives of another 36 Americans in
1993.
8..The UN ignores Communist atrocities but targets non-Communist nations
and leaders. When Soviet tanks rolled into Hungary in the 1950s, when the
Chinese Communists were murdering Tibetans in the 196s, when the Soviets
were butchering civilians in Afghanistan in the 1970s/1980s, when Chechnya
was brutalized by the Russians in the 1990s, the UN did Nothing!!!!! But
the UN declared tiny Rhodesia “a threat to international peace” in the
1960s, enabling pro-communist terrorist Robert Mugabe (yes this is the same
Bob that Komrade Klinton invited to the White House for State Dinner in
honor of the murderer of thousands of white land and business owners and
confiscation of white owned land and giving it to the Negroes. He was also
awarded the Presidential Gold Medal for Freedom and Humanity by Klinton) to
seize power. I believe it is known now as Zimbabwe..And it was a UN led
campaign that brought self-described Communist and convicted terrorist
Nelson Mandela (and yeessss,,,, Klinton awarded him the same gold medal) to
power in South Africa in the 1990s.
9..The UN embraces Communist China—history’s most murderous criminal
regime. In 1949, anti-Communist Nationalist China, one of the UN’s founding
members, was forced from the mainland to Taiwan by the Communists. In 1971,
the UN expelled Taiwan and embraced the brutal Red Chinese government—a
government responsible for over 35 million murders. When the vote admitting
Red China was announced, UN delegates danced in the aisles to show their
contempt for America and their joy at the triumph of Red China.
10..The bureaucrat-laden UN bestows official dignity on extreme moral
perversion. In 1993, the UN Economic and Social Council granted consultant
status to the International Gay and Lesbian (queers all) Association which
includes the North American Man/Boy Love Association (advocates of child
molestation) and the Dutch group Vereniging Martijn (which also promotes use
of children as sex objects). In 1988, the top Belgian UN Children’s Fund
(UNICEF) official was one of a group convicted of running a child sex ring.
Moral bankruptcy is commonplace in UN operations. In Zimbabwe,
UNICEF–donated equipment helped terrorists seize power. In Vietnam, the
Communists received $13 million from UNICEF while untold thousands of boat
people fled for their lives. UN employees are paid 40% more than comparable
U.S. workers and some receive subsidized rent. An ex-UNICEF official
confirmed that “pampered and cosseted staffs” of various aid agencies
“absorb 80% of all UN expenditures.”
11..America supplies the money, the UN then finances tyrants and assorted
enemies of the U.S., and conditions in the nations “aided”grow worse. U.S.
taxpayers pay 25% of the UN budget plus of 31% of the UN special-agency
budgets. Additional billions of our dollars go to the International Monetary
Fund (IMF), World Bank, and other UN-related lending agencies where they
have been used for incredibly wasteful and subversive UN projects. (Not
surprising since these agencies were designed by Soviet agent Harry Dexter
White, and Fabian Socialist (Hillary Diane Klinton claims membership in the
Fabians) John Maynard Keynes.) Socialist International spokesman Hilary
Marquand aptly described the IMF as “in essence a Socialist conception.”
World Bank “aid” funds went to brutal Marxist dictator Mengistu while he was
causing large-scale starvation and death in Ethiopia; to Tanzanian dictator
Julius Nyerere as he drove peasants off their land and burned their huts;
and to the Vietnamese Communists, sending thousands of boat people onto the
sea. Even Newsweek magazine concluded that the UN’s foreign aid programs
tend “to prop up incompetent governments or subsidize economies so they can
never stand on their own.”
12..The UN is a WAR organization, NOT a peace organization. Article 42 of
the UN Charter claims authority to “take such action by air, sea, or land
forces as may be necessary to maintain or restore international peace and
security.” But the UN definition of “peace” is never given. Tyrannical
regimes throughout history have defined “peace” as the absence of
opposition. To achieve “peace” in Katanga in 1961, UN planes bombed clearly
marked hospitals with the RED CROSS on their roofs. They bombed
administrative buildings, and private homes. Katanga was an ANTI-COMMUNIST
province of the Belgian Congo seeking freedom from the Communist-controlled
central government. The UN is not now, and has never been, a peace
organization. It will use whatever military power it is given to force all
nations of the world to submit.
Please write, call, fax, whatever you can to your elected “representatives”
and senators. Help get the UN out of the US, and us out of the UN!.....
A
Chester L McWhorter Sr, 504 N. Brighton Rd, Lecanto, Florida. 34461. Ph:
352-344-9073. Fax: Same. Email: clmmam@digitalusa.net
Gentlemen:
Southern Messenger received this Warning and we are concerned. After reading this report, you can find more on this subject at: http://www.4rie.com/secretsocieties.html
"American Communists worked energetically and tirelessly to lay the
foundations for the United Nations, which we were sure would come into
existence". Earl Browder, General Secretary, Communist Party-USA.
From: Chester L McWhorter Sr <mcwhorter@xtalwind.net>
Find out shocking answer
in 'Hope of the Wicked'
Ted Flynn's book, 'Hope of the Wicked: The Master Plan to Rule the World,'
will open your eyes to what may be the greatest deception in modern history.
It explores the convergence on a global basis of multinational corporations,
foundations and the political and sociological instruments of a one-world
government to bring about a New World Order.
The book is 550 pages with 82 photographs and 1,200 footnotes, with a strong
historical basis to show that there is a global elite working to end the
sovereignty of nations, to place all under the United Nations.
In this well-documented book, readers will learn the following:
* Is there a conspiracy to rule the world?
* What is the plan to bring America into a one-world order?
* Hundred of quotes from world leaders
* The utopian dream of the United Nations
* The long tentacles of the United Nations in your life
* World taxes and a world court for world citizens
* What is the Federal Reserve and who owns it?
* The links of world businesses, foundations and governments
* What are the Bilderbergers, Council on Foreign Relations and Trilateral
Commission?
* What are the authority and mission of FEMA?
* What is the role of the New Age movement and environmentalism in a world
religion?
* The erosion of rights, freedom and national sovereignty
* The need to create chaos to usher in a new world order
* The subversion of the Constitution by Executive Order
* What is the real agenda of secret societies? Technology's theft of
privacy: chips, satellites and tracking
* Is artificial weather modification real?
* Who was the most influential woman of the 20th Century?
* Who are the world players trying to bring change?
* Pulling the plug on the world economy - nearer than you may think
* How will the global elite's plans affect you and your family in the near
future?
The New World Order is not coming, offers Flynn - it is here with a
vengeance!
Just click on the link below, or cut and paste it into your browser bar, for
more information and ordering instructions from the WorldNetDaily.com online
store.
http://www.dxmarket.com/worldnetdaily/products/B0045.html
Subject: Shadow Government of the United States and the Decline of America.
In spite of all of the difficulties facing America, there is still no
other place I would rather live; however, our nation is at a crossroads, quite
like the difficulties faced by our forefathers. Many of the same
conditions that prompted the Declaration of Independence prevail in America today.
Of the indictments against the King of Great Britain, our Founders
declared:
"He has erected a Multitude of new offices, and sent hither Swarms of
Officers to harass our People and eat out their Substance." There are
literally hundreds of thousands of government employees administering
various regulatory agencies with budgets in the billions of dollars.
Regulatory compliance alone exceeds $460 billion annually. Our Founders,
opposed to "taxation without representation", also declared that the
King was: "imposing taxes on us without our consent". Yet, taxation with
representation now sees the average American working through May to meet
his or her yearly local, state, and federal tax obligations.
Commenting on debt, Benjamin Franklin warned: "The burden of debt is as
destructive to freedom as subjugation by conquest." Our legislators have
not balanced the federal budget since 1969, and the national debt has, since
1980, quadrupled to over $5 trillion. Its monthly interest costs now
exceed the yearly interest costs of just twenty years ago. The budget is still
not balanced as of January 01, 2000. There is no surplus!!! For hoodwinking
and fooling us into being complacent, they forecast a surplus for the year
2012!!! They have declared entitlements, and other funding off budget
such as the many S&L failures, bank failures, retirements, etc., so that the
true expenditures are not available to anyone except the Congressional Budget
Office (CBO). This is the surplus they brag about.
The Declaration of Independence states:
"We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable Rights."
Our second President, John Adams, said:
"You have Rights antecedent to all earthly governments; Rights that
cannot he repealed or restrained by human laws; Rights derived from the Great
Legislator of the universe."
Our Rights come from God. Why, then, are we reminded that our Rights
come from the state (civil rights)? What the state gives, it can take away.
We frequently hear our nation referred to as a democracy, yet the word is
not found in the Constitution.
Rather, we see in Article I, Section 4: "The United States shall
guarantee
to every State in this Union a Republican form of Government," The
Pledge of allegiance contains: " ..and to the Republic, for which it stands..
Commenting on our form of government, Chief Justice John Marshall
stated:
"Between a republic and a democracy, the difference is like that between
order and chaos."
Even though the current version of the pledge of allegiance to our flag
as mandated by the Federal Government contains the word "indivisible", that
is not true.. Under the Constitution of The United States, each state is a
sovereign entity unto itself, and may or may not divest itself from the
union as the people therein may determine for themselves.
The Soldiers Training Manual, issued November 30, 1928 gives the
following definitions:
"TM 2000-25: 118-120, democracy - A government of the masses. Authority
is derived through mass meeting or any other form of direct expression.
Results in mobocracy. Attitude toward property is communistic, negating property
rights. Attitude toward law is that the will of the people shall
regulate, whether it be based upon deliberation, or governed by passion,
prejudice, and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences. Results in
demagogism, license, agitation, discontent, and anarchy."
"TM2000-25: 120-121, republic - Authority is derived through election
by the people of public officials best fitted to represent them. Attitude
toward property is respect for laws and individual rights, and a
sensible economic procedure. Attitude toward law is the administration of justice
in accord with fixed principles, and established evidence, with a strict
regard to consequences. A greater number of citizens and extent of territory
may be brought within its compass. Avoids the dangerous extreme of either
tyranny or mobocracy. Results in statesmanship, liberty, reason, justice,
contentment, and progress.
1 Corinthians 7:23 says: "You were bought at a price; do not become
slaves of men."
It was upon this premise that our Founders drafted the Declaration of
Independence, our Constitution, and the first 10 amendments which are
the Bill of Rights. At the Constitutional Convention (1787), Benjamin
Franklin declared: "We have been assured in the Sacred Writings, that except
the Lord build the house, they labor in vain that build it."
Our duty as a nation was eloquently stated by George Washington:
"Whereas it is the duty of nations to acknowledge the providence of Almighty God,
to obey His will, to be grateful for His benefits, and to humbly implore
His protection and favor."
In 1892, the Supreme Court recognized:
"Our laws and our institutions must necessarily he based upon and
embody
the teachings of the Redeemer of mankind. It is impossible that it
should he otherwise.."
What would be the reactions to such statements made today? Outcries of
"separation of church and state? Contrary to what is often said, this
phrase will not be found in the Constitution.
The foregoing statements attest to the principles which established our
Constitutional Republic. Are the difficulties confronting America today
the
result of disregarding the wisdom and the warnings of our Founders?
Norman Thomas, for many years the U.S. Socialist Party (read Communist)
presidential candidate, stated:
"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But under
the name of liberalism, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist
program until one day America will be a socialist nation without knowing how it
happened."
We have often heard many debates and discussions about the nation's
debt. But who benefits from the $800 million per day interest on the national
debt?
James 5:3 says: "You have hoarded wealth in the last days." Who is
James referring to? Does this have anything to do with the "New World Order"?
1. What are its goals?
2. Who is promoting it?
3. How much power and influence do they have?
4. How close is it?
Consider these words spoken by James Madison in 1788 as the story
unfolds:
"I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of
the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by
violent and sudden usurpation."
For centuries, international bankers have enjoyed a lucrative business
by financing governments, and command considerable influence in the
policies of such governments. Repayment of these loans could usually be guaranteed
by the indebted government levying taxes upon its people. If a king or
government could not or would not repay its loans, its enemy or rival
would be financed. The business of financing wars was very profitable.
As the wealth of these private banking empires increased, they
eventually owned, as private corporations, the various central banks of Europe.
Predominant among these was the House of Rothschild, with banking houses
in
major European capitals. Their seat of power was located in London,
through control of the Bank of England. By loading more paper into circulation
than gold to back it (fractional reserve banking), they were able to amass
fortunes. Some historians contend that by 1850, the House of Rothschild
had more wealth than the combined monarchies of Europe.
What better way to expand economic control than by financing Europe's
colonization? And what better prize was there than America, with her
industrious people and vast resources? The War of Independence was not
only
independence from English rule, but economic independence as well. Our
Founders drafted the Constitution so that only Congress had control over
our monetary system, unlike the private monopolies controlling European
economics.
Thomas Jefferson issued this warning:
"If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue
of currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and
corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property
until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers
conquered."
In 1792, contrary to Jefferson's warning, Alexander Hamilton
established a 20 year charter with the Bank of England. When the renewal was denied in 1812, war broke out again. The charter was renewed in 1816. In 1833,
President Andrew Jackson removed all moneys from this chartered bank and
placed them into state banks. Mexico invaded Texas in 1836 after the
renewal was again denied. Some historians say these wars were attempts by the
European banking monopolies to disrupt and control Americas economy. The
War Between The States (Lincoln's War) continued this pattern.
Abraham Lincoln said: "The money powers prey upon the nation in times
of peace and conspire against it in times of adversity. It is more despotic
than a monarchy, more insolent than autocracy, (and) more selfish than
bureaucracy. It denounces, as public enemies, all who question its
methods
or throw light upon its crimes. I have two great enemies, the Southern
Army in front of me and the bankers in the rear. Of the two, the one at my
rear is my greatest foe ... corporations have been enthroned, and an era of
corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the
country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the
people until the wealth is aggregated in the hands of a few, and the
Republic is destroyed."
By the end of the 19th Century, American industrialists and bankers,
through the Industrial Revolution, had achieved great wealth. An
excellent account of this is Matthew Josephson's 1934 book, entitled "The Robber
Barons; the Great American Capitalists 1861-1901-(by Matthew Josephson,
Harcourt, Brace and Co. New York 1934; available secondary market).
The industrialists were known as "Big Business" and the Wall Street
bankers as the "Money Trust". The most prominent of these was banker J.P.
Morgan.
It was Morgan, working with the European banking dynasties, who created the
"Financial Panic of 1907" This was an effort to manipulate Congress to
approve of a central bank.
In 1912, Woodrow Wilson became President. his chief advisor and
administrator was Col. Edward Mandell House, who was a proponent of
world government, a representative of the European banking dynasties, and had
close ties with the Morgan interests.
In 1912, House wrote a book, wherein he laid out a plan to bring
America into a world government. ("Philip Dru: Administrator", by Col. Edward
Mandell House, 1912; available at General Birch Services, P.O. Box 8040
Appleton, Wis. 54913-8040).
On page 222, he wrote: "...our Constitution and our laws ... are not
only obsolete, but even grotesque." His plan, and, to use his own words, "a
conspiracy," would seek to achieve:
1. The establishment of a central bank;
2. A progressive graduated income tax; and;
3.Control of both political parties in the U.S.
What was House's goal? "Socialism as dreamed of by Karl Marx". House,
who called himself the "unseen guardian angel" of the Federal Reserve Act,
in concert with the Wall Street and European bankers, convinced President
Wilson of the central bank concept.
The Federal Reserve Act was passed on Dec. 23, 1913 (by a vote of 298
to 60 in the House of Representatives, and 43 to 25 in the Senate).
After the vote, Congressman Charles A. Lindberg, Sr. (father of the
famous aviator) told Congress: "This act establishes the most gigantic trust on
earth ... When the President signs this act, the invisible government by
the money power, proven to exist by the Money Trust Investigation, will be
legalized ... The new law will create inflation whenever the trusts want
inflation..."
The Fed was then able to manipulate the money supply. In the six years
prior to the 1929 Stock Market Crash, the Fed increased (or inflated)
the money supply 62%, inducing unwise investments and market speculation by
the public. When everything was in place, the bankers, who had been
financing
market speculation, called in their "24 hr. broker call loans",
precipitating the Crash.
They were then in a position to loan the government billions of dollars
to finance the nation out of the Depression. Congressman Louis McFadden,
Chairman of the House Banking Committee, (1920-1931) said this:
"it (the Depression) was not accidental. The international bankers
sought to bring about a condition of despair here so that they might emerge as
rulers of us all."
How powerful is the Fed? Congressman Wright Patman, Chairman of House
Banking committee (in the 60's) said: "in the U.S. today, we have in
effect, two governments ... we have the duly constituted government ... then we
have an independent, uncontrolled, and uncoordinated government in the
Federal Reserve System, operating the money powers which are reserved to the
Congress by the Constitution."
The Fed has never been audited, and has resisted all attempts to do so.
Lt. Col. Archibald Roberts (Director of Committee to Restore the
Constitution) began a campaign on March 30, 1971, testifying before Wisconsin
legislators about the fraud surrounding the Fed. (The text of his address is in the
Congressional Record, E3212-E3224, entered April 19, 1971). Roberts and
other constitutional groups (including Washington state Senator Jack
Metcalf) had, by the mid 80's, acquired about 20 states' support calling
for audits/reforms, with no success.
Again, in the late 80's, Congressman Henry Gonzales (Texas) called for
abolition of the Federal Open Market Committee and the repeal of the
Federal Res. Act. (HR 1469, 1470).
Congressman Phil Crane (Illinois) also introduced HR 70, calling for an
audit. (Currently, Gonzales and Crane, are calling for an audit/reforms
under HR 28 and 145; Senator Byron Dorgan, (N. Dakota) called for a
similar bill in the Senate, S212).
Since Wilson took office, the national debt has risen from $1 billion
to over $13 trillion - that's just "on budget" debt. When added to the "off
budget" debt of the S&L debacle and unfunded retirement liabilities
(especially those of members of Congress & staff), the total now exceeds
our Gross Domestic Product.
Is the country bankrupt? Roosevelt declared it so by Executive Orders
6073, 6102, 6111, and also by EO 6260 on March 9, 1933 (as proclaimed under
the "Trading With the Enemy Act of 65th Congress, Oct. 6, 1917, and as
codified at 12 U.S.C.A. 95a, which allows the President exceptional control under
a "state of emergency") On April 5,1933, FDR issued this EO:
"All persons are required to deliver on or before May 1, 1933 all gold
coins, gold bullion, and gold certificates now owned by them to a
Federal Reserve Bank, branch or agency, or to any member bank of the Federal
Reserve System."
On June 5, 1933, Congress confirmed the bankruptcy. (through the "Joint
Resolution to Suspend The Gold Standard And Abrogate The Gold Clause,
June 5, 1933"). This was HJR 102, 73rd Congress, Ist session. Then, through
another EO issued by President Johnson in 1968, silver backing was
removed from our currency. This made the country insolvent. There is nothing
backing our currency now, no gold, no silver, no platinum, no Nuclear waste
products, no nothing. You will note on your older paper money the logo
of the Federal Reserve System, and therein it identifies which bank backs
that bill, i.e., Bank of Philadelphia, Bank of Chicago, Bank of New York,
Bank of St Louis. On the newer bills you will see a new logo that states simply
"the federal reserve system".
Backing?
The Fed issues currency no longer redeemable for silver. Furthermore,
the Fed is not a government institution. You will never find them listed in
phone directories under "government offices".
It is a private corporation owned by approximately 300 Class A
stockholders. These people own the Fed by owning the stock of the
largest member banks in the New York Federal Reserve Bank, which, for all
practical purposes, is the Federal Reserve. You will not find one government
employee among them. The controlling interest is held by less than a dozen
international bankers, whose names, until recently, was one of the
best-kept secrets of international finance:
1. Rothschild Banks of London & Berlin.
2. Lehman Bros. Bank of N.Y.
3. Lazard Bros. Banks of Paris
4. Kuhn, Loeb Bank of N.Y.
5. Israel Moses Sief Banks of Italy.
6. Chase Manhattan Bank of N.Y.
7. Warburg Bank of Hamburg & Amsterdam.
8. Goldman, Sachs Bank of N.Y.
The most influential of the European interests is the Rothschild family
in London. Each of the American interests is, in various ways, connected to
this family, including the Rockefeller's, who are by far the most
powerful of the Fed's American stockholders (primarily through the Chase
Manhattan Bank).
Thomas Jefferson issued this warning:
"if the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue
of currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and the
corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of
all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their
fathers conquered."
Today, less than 2% of Americans own their homes.
The Fed, like other central banks, uses a system called "fractional
banking." Deposits become the "fraction", allowing the system to
"create" as much as 770% of that deposit: i.e.: a $1,000 deposit becomes
approximately $7,700 a $10.000 deposit becomes approximately $77,000. In addition,
examine the "amount due" on your property tax statement: You will not find a
dollar sign affixed to that final payment "amount". Furthermore, the use of
the $ sign is missing on virtually all financial statements from virtually all
businesses.
Why? The Currency Act of 1792, which has never been revoked, defines a
dollar as 412.5 grains of 9/10 fine silver (originally 371.25 grains of
11/12 fine silver). Federal Reserve Notes are not redeemable in silver.
To affix a dollar sign to the "amount due" would be fraudulent. They know
this and you have not known it.
> >
> > Article I, Section 8, Clause 5 says that only Congress has the power
> > to..."coin money, regulate the value thereof and fix the standard of
> > weights and measures." Article I, Section 10, Clause 1 says that No
State
> > shall ... make anything but gold and silver coin a legal tender in
payment
> > of debts..." The Federal Reserve operates in violation of the
> Constitution.
> >
> > Since Col. House helped establish the Federal Reserve Act, and believed
> in
> > socialism, is the central bank concept Marxist?
> >
> > Plank 5 of Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto reads: "Centralization of
> credit
> > in the hands of the State, by means of a national bank with State
capital,
> > and an exclusive monopoly." Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx.
> >
> > House also knew, that in addition to controlling a nation's monetary
> > system, a method of taxation had to be established, and in 1913, the
16th
> > Amendment was passed. This graduated income tax was hailed by proponents
> as
> > a "tax on the wealthy" (sound familiar?).
> >
> > Nothing could have been farther from the truth. As with the passage of
> the
> > Federal Reserve Act, "Big Business" and the Wall Street bankers publicly
> > denounced, but privately funded its promotion and passage. Why? Through
> > their influence in government circles, they insured the necessary
> loopholes
> > in the bill were included - tax-exempt foundations. By the time the 16th
> > Amendment was passed, they had already established the Rockefeller and
> > Carnegie Foundations.
> >
> > Their wealth was allowed to compound tax-free while their competitors
> were
> > saddled with tax burdens. The Amendment also allowed Congress to
increase
> > and broaden the tax on the general public.
> >
> > Until 1929, the size and cost of the Federal government was
> > Constitutionally limited: it borrowed little money and paid little
> interest.
> > The Depression years following the Stock Market Crash changed all this.
> With
> > the country officially bankrupt in 1933, taxes could now be broadened
and
> > increased to finance government borrowing. Roosevelt's New Deal began
the
> > era of entitlements which are with us today.
> >
> > Two points must be made here:
> >
> > 1) The 16th Amendment (Income Tax 3 Feb 1913) was never properly
> ratified.
> > This has been proven in court. Two of the 36 states that had allegedly
> > ratified the amendment were California and Kentucky - There is no record
> of
> > California's vote, and Kentucky legislators voted against it 22-9. This
> > violates the amendment procedure of our Constitution, Article V.
> > 2. The 16th Amendment has Marxist roots. Plank 2 of the Communist
> Manifesto
> > calls for: "a heavy progressive or graduated income tax".
> >
> > Thus, the conspirators, through financial influence and brilliant
> > deception, had established the mechanisms to:
> > 1. run up the debt;
> > 2. collect the debt;
> > 3. for themselves, to avoid the taxes necessary to pay the interest on
> the
> > debt.
> >
> > The pillage of America began in earnest during the Depression. The Fed
> > deflated (reduced) the money supply, forcing thousands into bankruptcy
and
> > foreclosure. The following guidelines were intended for leading
financiers
> > ONLY, but it appeared in the Civil Servants' Year Book, "The Organizer",
> > Jan. 1934:
> >
> > "Capital must protect itself in every way ... Debts must be
collected
> > and loans and mortgages foreclosed as soon as possible. When through a
> > process of law the common people have lost their homes, they will he
more
> > tractable and more easily governed by the strong arm of the law applied
by
> > the central power of leading financiers. People without homes will not
> > quarrel with their leaders. This is well known among our principal men
now
> > engaged in forming an imperialism of capitalism to govern the world."
> >
> > Plank no. 1 of the Communist Manifesto is "abolition of private
> > property". The conspirators knew that the American people had to somehow
> be
> > convinced into paying for the government borrowing that began during the
> > Depression, Their opportunity came during W.W.II with the victory Tax
Act
> of
> > 1942 (56 Stat, Ch. 619, pg. 884; October 21, 1942).
> >
> > This was a voluntary and temporary measure to help finance the war
> effort.
> > Why was it voluntary? Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 and Article I,
> Section
> > 9, Clause 4 of the Constitution forbids direct taxation unless
> apportioned.
> > Apportionment means to divide equally among the population (census). The
> > last time direct taxes were laid upon the American people by
apportionment
> > was during the Civil War. The Victory Tax Act of 1942 was repealed on
May
> > 29, 1944 (58 Stat, Ch. 2 1 0, pg. 234). With American patriotism high
and
> > D-Day a week away, who would notice that this voluntary un-apportioned
> > direct tax had been repealed?
> >
> > The clauses of the Constitution regarding direct taxation are still
> law.
> > The 16th Amendment gave Congress "no new powers of taxation" (Stanton
vs.
> > Baltic Mining Co., 240 U.S. 103). The "...incomes ... without
> > apportionment...", in the 16th Amendment places it in the category of an
> > indirect (excise) tax (Brushaber vs. Union Pacific RR Co., 240 U.S. 1).
> > Simply stated, it is a profits tax. How would the government operate
> without
> > personal income tax revenues?
> >
> > With imposts, duties, tariffs, and excises (Article I, Section 8,
Clause
> > 1).
> >
> > Can you see why NAFTA and GATT is promoted? The 1984 Grace Commission,
> > Report to the President, pg. 4 reveals where personal income taxes go:
> "100%
> > of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the Federal Debt
> and
> > by Federal transfer payments. In other words, all individual income tax
> > revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services taxpayers
> > expect from their government." Can you begin to see why there have been
> 195
> > tax increases since 1937 Today, three quarters of the Federal budget is
> > unconstitutional, according to Article I, Section 8, Clauses 2-18. Why
do
> > our elected representatives allow this? Remember, the third item on Col.
> > House's agenda was to control both political parties of the U.S.
> >
> > "Tragedy and Hope, A History of the World in Our Time" (by Carroll
> Quigley,
> > 1966, The MacMillan Co., N.Y.; available from Angriff Press, Box 2726,
> > Hollywood, California 90028) was written by Georgetown University
> Professor
> > Carroll Quigley.
> >
> > It was intended as a text for aspiring globalists, and gives a 1300
> page
> > account of the history, mechanisms, and goals through which a ruling
> > financial dynasty would control a global economy. On page 52, the author
> > writes that the international bankers were:
> >
> > "...devoted to secrecy and the secret use of financial influence in
> > political life."
> >
> > There are two organizations formed by and intimately associated with
the
> > international bankers:
> >
> > 1. The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). 58 E 68th St, New York,
NY.
> > 10027. Ph: 1-212-434-9400. Fax: 1-212-861-2701. E-mail:
> membership@cfr.org.
> > Web: www.cfr.org.
> >
> > 2. The Tri Lateral Commission (TLC). 345 E 46th St, New York, NY.
> 10017.
> > Ph: 212-661-1180. Fax: 1-212-949-7268. E-mail: admin@trilateral.org.
Web:
> > www.trilateral.org.
> >
> > Let's examine briefly their background and their stated goals.
> >
> > Because America refused to join the League of Nations following WW I,
> > representatives from the American financial dynasties met with their
> British
> > counterparts in Paris on May 19, 1919. The American contingent was led
by
> > Col. House and became known as the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
It
> > was founded on July 29, 1921, backed by Rockefeller and Carnegie
> Foundation
> > money. It included many of the same people who established the Federal
> > Reserve. Its quarterly journal, "Foreign Affairs", has called for world
> > government as far back as December, 1922. CFR member James Warburg
(whose
> > father Paul Warburg merged his Manhattan Bank with Rockefeller's Chase
> > Bank), a former aide to FDR, told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee
> > this on Feb. 17, 1950:
> >
> > "You shall have world government, whether or not you like it, by
conquest
> > or consent." On Nov. 25th, 1959, the CFR published Study NO.7, which
> spells
> > out their goal:
> >
> > " ... building a new international order (which) must be responsive to
> world
> > aspirations for peace (and) for social and economic change ... an
> > international order ... including states labeling themselves as
> Socialist.,,
> > In the 50th anniversary issue of "Foreign Affairs", a leading article
was
> > written by CFR member Kingman Brewster, Jr., entitled "Reflections on
Our
> > National Purpose". In this article, he stated that our national purpose
> > should be to abolish our nationality. In a 1974 article in "Foreign
> > Affairs", entitled "The Hard Road to World Order", CFR member Richard
> > Gardner wrote that the house of world order would have to be built
> through:
> >
> > " ... an end run around our national sovereignty, eroding it piece by
> > piece." As of January 2000, the CFR has 3657 (up from 2905 in 1992),
> members
> > in the U.S. 1999 Annual Report direct from the CFR, ( and the 1992
Annual
> > Report, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Harold Pratt House, 58
East
> > 68tli St., N.Y., N.Y. 10021.
> >
> > ("We're going to push through health care reform regardless of the
views
> of
> > the American People", John D Rockefeller IV, June 1994, in a speech to
the
> > Wall Street Journal. (sounds like a continuation of the same
philosophy,
> > does it not?))
> >
> > The second organization, The Tri Lateral Commission, was formed in
> 1973
> > by David Rockefeller (grandson of John D. Rockefeller). David
Rockefeller
> > has also been a director of the CFR since 1949. The Tri Lat Comm was the
> > brainchild of Columbia University professor Zbigniew Brzezinski, who, in
> his
> > book "Between Two Ages," advocated an economic alliance among the
western
> > industrialized nations. Rockefeller hired Brzezinski, made him the
> executive
> > director, and established a trilateral alliance encompassing Japan,
North
> > America, and western Europe. Its first meeting was held in Tokyo Oct.
21,
> > 1973 In Brzezinski's book, the author states: on page 198 - America is
in
> > obsolescence; on page 260 - he advocates central (Marxist) planning; on
> page
> > 296 - he wants to develop limitations on sovereignty; on page 308 of his
> 309
> > page book, he finally states his goal: a world government. Henry
Kissinger
> > is one of the most powerful and influential members of the Tri Lat Comm
> > (also CFR). He was interviewed by columnist Paul Scott, who said that it
> is
> > Kissinger's belief that by controlling energy, especially oil, one can
> > control nations and their financial systems.
> >
> > By placing food, oil, and the world's monetary system under
> > international control, Kissinger is convinced that a world government
can
> > become a reality. As of April, 1992, the Tri Lateral Commission has 320
> > members divided up among Japan, North America, and Western Europe. (the
> Tri
> > Lateral Commission, 345 East 46th Street, N.Y., N.Y. 10017 or call
> > 212-661-1180).
> >
> > The Tri Lat's goal is a one world government, the same as that of
the
> > CFR. The first 35 members of the Tri Lat were also members of the CFR.
> They
> > both have as members some of the most elite names in finance, industry,
> > media, labor, academic circles, news media, and government. Their
rosters
> > read like a who's who in these areas.
> >
> > What's the difference between the CFR and the Tri Lat? The CFR has
> been
> > around since 1921, the Tri Lat, since 1973. The only difference is the
> fact
> > that the Tri Lat is an elite group, who's been chosen to speed up the
> > process of a one-world government through the control of food, energy,
and
> > an international monetary system.
> >
> > Keep in mind that economic union always precedes political union.
Lets
> > examine the CFR and Tri Lat influence in government. CFR control in
> > government actually began in earnest in 1939 by establishing within the
> U.S.
> > State Department a "Committee on Post-War Problems", the group (staffed
> and
> > funded by the CFR) which designed the United Nations. (the story of
which
> is
> > contained in State Dept. Publication 2349-"Report To The President On
The
> > Results of the San Francisco Conference").
> >
> > Since WWII, the CFR has filled key positions in virtually every
> > administration since then. Furthermore, since Eisenhower, every man who
> has
> > won the nomination for either party (except Goldwater in 1964 and Reagan
> in
> > 1980) has been a member of the CFR:
> >
> > DEMOCRATS
> > 1. John W. Davis(1924)
> > 2. Adlai Stevenson (1952,56)
> > 3. John F. Kennedy (1961-63)
> > 4. Hubert Humphrey (1968)
> > 5. George McGovern (1972)
> > 6. Jimmy Carter (1976,80)
> > 7. Walter Mondale (1984)
> > 8. Michael Dukakis (1988)
> > 9. Bill Clinton (1992-2001)
> > 10. Bill Bradley.
> > 11. And many others (ref Membership List Eff 1 January 2000).
> > REPUBLICANS
> > 1. Herbert Hoover (1928,32)
> > 2. Wendell Wilkie (1940)
> > 3. Thomas Dewey (1944,48)
> > 4. Dwight Eisenhower (1952,56)
> > 5. Richard Nixon (1960,68,72)
> > 6. Gerald Ford (1976)
> > 7. George Bush (1988,92) (who was also a director of the CFR 1977-1979)
> > 8. Senator John McCain first elected to the house in 82 then the senate
> in
> > 86. Now in 3rd term.
> > 9. Texas Gov George W Bush must be assumed to be a member as he refuses
> to
> > answer questions on this subject.
> > 10. And many others (ref Membership List Eff 1 January 2000).
> >
> > An important point must be stressed: By controlling the candidates
we
> > vote for, the CFR and by association, the Tri Lat Comm, they are assured
> of
> > their goal of a one world government.
> >
> > Why? Because CFR presidents fill key positions with CFR members by
> > APPOINTMENT. (List of 110 Nixon appts. can be found in "None Dare Call
it
> > Conspiracy, by Gary Allen, 1972; available from General Birch Services,
> P.O.
> > Box 8040, Appleton, Wis. 54913)
> >
> > Since 1973, Tri Lat members have also filled key positions. One of
the
> > first members of the Tri Lat was Jimmy Carter, whose administration had
19
> > Tri Laterals including:
> > 1. Vice President Mondale
> > 2. Secretary of State Vance
> > 3. Secretary of the Treasury Blumenthal
> > 4. Secretary of Defense Brown
> > 5. National Security Advisor Brzezinski
> >
> > These five positions made up the National Security Council, and were
> > held by members of an organization which advocates world government -
was
> > their oath of office to uphold the Constitution a mere formality?
> >
> > Others included:
> > 1) nearly all of the under-secretaries of State;
> > 2) nearly all of the under-secretaries of Treasurer;
> > 3) the Panama Canal Treaty negotiator; (of which Carter has effectively
> > given away)
> > 4) the Salt Treaty negotiator;
> > 5) the Ambassador to the U.N. Andrew Young;
> > and 6) the Ambassador to Italy, Richard Gardner (remember, the Israel
> Moses
> > Sief Banks of Italy are top stockholders in the Fed, and Gardner
advocated
> > an "...end run around our national Sovereignty, eroding it piece by
> piece.")
> >
> > An article about Brzezinski (Carter's National Security Advisor,
> executive
> > director of the Tri Lat, and author of "Between Two Ages") and Carter
> > appeared in the March 1, 1978 New York Times: "The two men met for the
> first
> > time about four years ago, when Mr. Bzrezinski was the executive
director
> of
> > the Tri Lateral Commission, and had the foresight to ask the then
obscure
> > governor of Georgia to join its ranks. Their initial teacher-student
> > relationship blossomed during the campaign and appears to have grown
> closer
> > still." Brzezinski (teacher) praises Marxism, thinks the U.S. is in
> > obsolescence, and advocates a world government; the student was the
> > President of the United States!
> >
> > Another article, written by CFR past president Winston Lord, appeared in
> the
> > August 4-11, 1978 issue of "W" magazine. He boasted:
> >
> > "The Tri Lateral Commission doesn't secretly run the world the
Council
> > on Foreign Relations does that."
> >
> > Winston Lord was the Assistant Secretary for East Asian/Pacific
> Affairs
> > (State Dept) special envoy to Red China, and U. S. Ambassador to China.
> > Contrary to candidate Clinton's "stand" on human rights, Red China has
> > recently received an unconditional MFN (called "normal" today in order
to
> > confuse us poor dumb stupid citizens) trade status with the U.S.; never
> mind
> > that over 10,000 Chinese dissidents have been murdered since Tianemen
> > Square.
> >
> > The CFR domination of just the last three Administrations reveals:
> > 1. 347 under Reagan;
> > 2. 382 under Bush,
> > and 3. 387 under Clinton (over 1 in 8 of their total membership).
> >
> > The following CFR members hold top positions in our current
> Administration:
> >
> > 1. President Bill Clinton
> > 2. Vice President Al Gore
> > 3. Secretary of State Warren Christopher (Now Madeleine Albright).
> > 4. Deputy Secretary of State Clifton R. Wharton
> > 5. CIA Director R. James Woolsey
> > 6. National Security Advisor W. Anthony Lake
> > 7. Deputy National Security Advisor Samuel R. Berger
> > 8. Secretary of Defense Les Aspen (and now Cohen)
> > 9. Chmin., Intel. Adv. Bd. William J. Crowe
> > 10. U.N. Ambassador Madeleine Albright (see 3 abpve).
> > 11. Sec. H.& H.S., Donna E. Shalala
> > 12. OMB Alice M. Rivlin
> > 13. Ex-Secretary H.U.D., Henry G. Cisneros
> > 14. Chminn., Council Ec. Advisors, Laura D. Tyson
> > 15. Ex-Secretary of the Treasury Lloyd M. Bentsen (former CFR)
> > 16. Secretary of the Interior Bruce Babbitt
> > 17. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg
> > 18. Tom Foley, Ambassador to Japan.
> > 19. And many others (ref Jan 1 2000 membership list)
> > There are 370 others as well.
> >
> > Have you ever wondered why, since WW II, U.S. foreign policy has
allowed
> > Communist expansion? Consider the roles of the following CFR members
since
> > WW II:
> > 1. George Marshall and Dean Acheson engineered the betrayal of Chiang
> > Kai-shek, allowing communist takeover of China;
> > 2. Dean Acheson and Dean Rusk arranged the no-win undeclared war in
Korea
> > and the removal of General MacArthur;
> > 3. John Foster Dulles and Allen Dulles, under CFR President Eisenhower
> > betrayed Hungarian freedom fighters and knowingly brought Fidel Castro
to
> > power in Cuba;
> > 4. McGeorge Bundy, Adlai Stevenson, and John J. McCloy saw to it that
the
> > Bay of Pigs invasion to oust Castro failed;
> > 5. Dean Rusk, Robert McNamara, and Henry Cabot Lodge pushed the U.S.
into
> > Vietnam and then drew the rules making victory impossible;
> > 6. Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger continued these policies, which
led
> to
> > communist takeover of South Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos;
> > 7. Henry Kissinger, Ellsworth Bunker, and Sol Linowitz arranged for the
> > Panama Canal giveaway - and paid $400 million dollars to that Marxist
> > dictatorship to take it; 8. Under leadership of Zbigniew Brzezinski,
> Cyris
> > Vance, and Warren Christopher, the Carter Administration undermined U.S.
> > allies in Iran and Nicaragua;
> > 9. Under Reagan, George Schultz, William J. Casey, and Malcom Baldridge
> > arranged U.S. foreign aid to communist Romania, communist Poland, and
the
> > U.S.S.R.; they also impeded anti-Communists in El Salvador and
Nicaragua.
> >
> > Why? It is easier to control oppressive Marxist regimes than nations of
> > free men - in a one-world socialist government. Yes, Col. House's agenda
> of
> > controlling both political parties in the U.S. has been achieved,
through,
> > as Madison warned, "silent and gradual encroachment."
> >
> > An excellent history of the CFR is found in "The Shadows of Power"
> > (James Perloff, 1988, Western Island Publishers, P.O. Box 8040,
Appleton,
> > Wis. 54913, 1-414-749-3783).
> >
> > Just as Col. House led an American contingent to Paris in 1919, there
are
> > also powerful like-minded organizations in Europe, through financial
> > control, promoting a one world government.
> >
> > The most prominent of these is the Bilderbergers.(est. in 1954), and
> is
> > largely responsible for the unification of Europe through the Treaty of
> Rome
> > (1957).
> >
> > Regardless of where these groups are from, their goal is a one world
> > government, and the U.N.. which they established, is the platform from
> which
> > it will be launched.
> >
> > The Rockefeller's play a key role in Americas financial and
political
> > life. Currently, David Rockefeller is the honorary chairman of both the
> CFR
> > and the Tri Lateral Commission, as well as (through his Chase Manhattan
> > Bank) a top stockholder in the Federal Reserve.
> >
> > It is interesting to note that in 1997 Senator John D. Rockefeller IV,
> > traveled to Japan at Taxpayers expense (est $31,000) to look into
> increased
> > trade with Japan. In fact he went to attend a meeting of the Tri Lateral
> > Commission, a non government organization, dedicated to the socialistic
> > overthrow of our Constitution and Republic form of Government via the
> > machinations of the UN! We The People paid for this!
> >
> > The Rockefeller influence goes back to 1890, when John D.
Rockefeller
> > was refining nearly 90% of all crude oil in the country, and frequently
> > worked in concert with Wall Street banker J.P. Morgan. By the turn of
the
> > century, John D. purchased the Chase Bank and brother William bought the
> > National City Bank of new York, and in 1913, became part of the Federal
> > Reserve System. The Rockefeller Foundation was also in full operation by
> > that time, effectively nullifying the "tax on the wealthy" as the
> proponents
> > of 16th Amendment had publicized. According to the Sept. 16, 1916 New
York
> > Times, the Rockefeller oil holdings alone were worth $500 million. By
> 1930,
> > the 200 largest corporations, under Rockefeller and Morgan influence,
held
> > over 49% of the assets of all 40,000 corporations in the country. AT&T
> > (controlled by Morgan) had greater assets than the total wealth in 21
> > states.
> >
> > The influence of the Rockefeller and Morgan groups was so great, they
> could
> > affect the economic life of the country to a large degree and almost
> control
> > its political life on the Federal level.
> >
> > The Rockefeller's increased their leverage over the economy throughout
> the
> > Depression years:
> >
> > 1) many of their competitors were hard-hit by the Stock Market Crash;
> > 2) and, being a part of the Fed, the Rockefellers benefited from
> massive
> > government borrowing;
> > 3) which, in turn, furthered their control of industry, soon to be
> > mobilized for war production.
> >
> > Americas entry into WW II enhanced all of the above, and their wealth
> > continued to be funneled into the tax-exempt foundations.
> >
> > Following the War, the U.S. was in such bad economic condition, that in
> > 1950, it declared bankruptcy a second time and the Secretary of Treasury
> was
> > appointed as "Receiver" in the Bankruptcy (Reorganization Plan No. 26,
> Title
> > 5 U.S. Code 903, Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, page 5967).
> >
> > In 1953, Congressman Carroll Reese of Tennessee initiated a
> Congressional
> > Committee to investigate the tremendous influence of the huge tax-exempt
> > foundations and their control over the economy.
> >
> > Yet, even Congress had little influence in diminishing the tremendous
> > influence and control the international bankers exercised in the
economy.
> > The Rockefeller's wealth continued to expand - their foundations allows
> > their wealth to compound.
> >
> > Each year the Rockefeller's can dump up to half of their income into
> their
> > foundations and deduct these donations from their income tax. Nelson
> > Rockefeller admitted at his confirmation hearings (for V.P.):
> >
> > "The foundation pays no capital gains tax and no income tax, so those
> funds
> > can continue to multiply"
> >
> > And indeed they have. The following information on the Rockefeller's
> more
> > current wealth is derived from Congressman Patman's Report in the
> > Congressional Record. What you are about read is direct ownership of
> stock;
> > pay particular attention to the oil companies.
> >
> > In direct stock, they own: Exxon - 156.7 million; Rockefeller Center -
98
> > million; Standard of California - 85 million; IBM - 72.6 million; Chase
> > Manhattan Bank - 18 million. Others that they have 10 million or more in
> > are: Mobil Oil, Eastman Kodak, General Electric, Texas Instruments,
> > Minnesota Mining & Mfg., and they own significant portions of about 50
> other
> > major American companies.
> >
> > A look at their security holdings reveals: They control Chase-Manhattan
> > Bank, City National Bank of New York, and Chemical Bank, among others;
> these
> > are in the top of the list.
> >
> > The Chase Manhattan Bank deals in many foreign countries as well as
> > corporations: well over 100 countries with about 50,000 affiliated
banks.
> >
> > A look at the interlocking boards of directors in the insurance
industry,
> > at the time this data was compiled, the Rockefeller's controlled 3 of
the
> 4
> > largest insurance companies in the world, that being Metropolitan Life,
> > Equitable Life, and New York Life. The assets of these three at that
time
> > was $113 billion. They control others as well.
> > Just to summarize the banks and insurance companies, this amounts to
25%
> of
> > all the assets of the 50 largest banks, and 30% of all the assets of the
> 50
> > largest life insurance companies. This gives them leverage over the
> economy
> > that goes far beyond direct ownership. Congressman Patman also found
that
> if
> > you control 5% or more of the stock in a corporation, whose stock is
> widely
> > held, you have in effect, minority control.
> >
> > If we take those corporations that the Rockefeller family has 10%
> control,
> > or 5%, and at least two members of their board of directors, we have the
> > following: Exxon, Mobil Oil, Standard of California, Standard of
Indiana,
> > International Harvester, Inland Steel, Marathon Oil, Quaker Oats,
> > Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel, Freeport Sulphur, and International Basic
> Economy
> > Corporation.
> >
> > Corporations which are probably under Rockefeller influence, and I say
> > probably, because it's extremely difficult to trace stock ownership
> through
> > trusts and foundations, are these: Texaco, IT&T, Westinghouse, Boeing,
> > International Paper, Sperry Rand, Xerox, National Cash Register,
National
> > Steel, American Home Products, Pfizer, Avon, and Merck.
> >
> > Merck agreed to buy Medco Containment, the nation's largest marketer of
> > discount prescription medicines. The acquisition makes Merck, by far,
the
> > biggest integrated producer and distributor of pharmaceuticals in the
> > country. (Wall Street Journal, 7-29-93). Transportation companies under
> the
> > Rockefeller influence include Penn Central, TWA, Eastern Airlines,
United
> > Airlines, National Airlines, Delta, Braniff, and Consolidated
Freightways.
> > Others they control through interlocking boards of directors are: Allied
> > Chemical, Annaconda Copper, DuPont, Monsanto, Olin-Mathison, Borden,
> > National Distillers, Shell, Gulf, Union Oil, Dow, Celanese, Pittsburgh
> Plate
> > Glass, Cities Service, Stauffer Chemical, Continental Oil, Union
Carbide,
> > American Cyanamid, American Motors, Bendix, and Chrysler. Isn't that
odd?
> >
> > Who's the biggest stock Holders in Chrysler and you had to bail them
out?
> > Other's are CIT Financial, SS Kresge and RH Macy. To summarize what you
> have
> > just read, that's 37 of the top 100 industrials, 9 of the top 20
> > transportation firms, the nation's No. 1 utility, three of the top four
> > insurance companies, plus scores of smaller companies engaged in
> > manufacturing, distribution, retail sales, loans or investments. These
are
> > just the known figures. So, can you start to see the economic power the
> > Rockefeller family now? In addition to this, recognize the power they
have
> > through the membership in the Tri Lateral Commission and the CFR through
> > other heads of multi national corporations.
> >
> > There were published several reports under the Senate Investigating
> > Subcommittee on Reports, Accounting, and Management. They're under the
> > "Committee on Governmental Affairs, United States Senate, January 1978."
> The
> > first report is entitled " Interlocking Boards of Directors Among Major
> U.S.
> > Corporations.
> >
> > This Senate study looked at the top 130 corporations and placed every
> name
> > of every board of directors into a computer and found this: 70% of the
top
> > 130 corporations are interlocked directly or indirectly with the lower
> > companies. They even found many competing companies and corporations
have
> > the same board of directors and several members of the same board of
> > directors, which is illegal according to Section 8 of the Clayton Act.
> When
> > this point is reached, you don't have competition anymore, you have
> > price-fixing. Some of these people were sitting on 16 different boards
of
> > directors! In the April 1993 IBM proxy statement, this can be
> demonstrated.
> > Also, 8 of these 18 directors are CFR members. (IBM Notice of 1993
Annual
> > Meeting and Proxy Statement; IBM, Armonk, N.Y. 10504)
> >
> > The second report the same committee did was called "Voting
Rights-Major
> > U.S. Corporations". They looked at 122 corporations and found this: One
> > corporation, Morgan Guaranty and Trust, was in the top five vote-holders
> of
> > 57 of those corporations; another, City National Bank of New York, was
in
> > the top five vote holders of 36 of those.
> >
> > That's 93 of the top 122 corporations. Now, who was the top vote holder
> in
> > the parent company of Morgan Guaranty and Trust? Number one was City
> > National Bank of New York, and number two was the Chase Manhattan Bank,
> > which means that the Rockefeller's controlled Morgan Guaranty and Trust
> and
> > also the City National Bank of New York. The Rockefeller's are in the
top
> > five vote holders in 93 of those 122 corporations. This is what the
> > Subcommittee found in 1978! Why didn't we hear about it? At that time,
> half
> > of the members of the Senate Subcommittee responsible for this study
were
> > CFR/Tri Lat members.
> >
> > There shouldn't be much doubt who controls the oil here. But what about
> the
> > Middle East oil? Now, supposedly, OPEC has nationalized, in most cases,
> the
> > oil fields over there. Aramco, an oil consortium of Exxon, Mobil,
Texaco,
> > and SOCAL got 42% on every petro dollar and OPEC 58% during the late
70's
> > "energy crisis ". Do you think it bothered them that the price of gas
> > doubled while the media was telling us there was an oil shortage? Are
they
> > doing it to us again today with the huge increase in oil prices of from
> > $12.00 per barrel two weeks ago to $32.00 per barrel today?
> >
> > The Tri Lat "engineered" the '70s crisis. Its planning publication is
> > called the "Triangle Papers". On page 73 of Publication No. 17, entitled
> > "Energy: Managing the Transition (1978), we find this:
> >
> > "We therefore urge each Tri Lateral government to review its tax
> structure
> > and develop specific energy taxes. An obvious example here is a higher
> > federal excise tax on gasoline in the United States."
> >
> > In other words, they created the crisis, and we paid for it at the
pumps
> > through higher prices and higher taxes. Who got blamed? OPEC. The same
> > people who control the oil here also exercise control in the Middle
East.
> > According to the 1974 report of the Senate Foreign Relations
Subcommittee
> on
> > Multinational Corporations, the Aramco consortium attempted to block
> > America's emergency airlift to Israel, during the Yom Kippur War of
1973.
> > These companies cooperated closely with Saudi Arabia to deny oil and
fuel
> to
> > the U.S. Navy. In the 1930's, it was Standard Oil (Rockefeller) money
that
> > established the oil industry over there - Makes one wonder about Desert
> > Storm, what was it really all about? Remember, the President then and as
> > now, and most cabinet members were and are members of the CFR/Tri Lat
> Comm.
> >
> > Remember also, that it is Kissinger's belief that a world government
can
> be
> > brought about by controlling an international monetary system,
oil/energy,
> > and food. Consider how far the control of food has evolved. In the
> > seventies, Senator Gannon ran a study in five counties of Kansas. He
found
> > that 85,000 acres over the 8,000 acres legal limit were illegally owned
by
> > large multinational corporations. The American Agriculture news paper
also
> > reported that six coal companies, who were in turn controlled by the oil
> > companies, owned somewhere in the neighborhood of 80% of the farm land
in
> > Illinois. These are just a few examples. Remember, in 1973, the Tri
> Lateral
> > Commission was formed, and in 1973 the large multinational
corporations
> > started diversifying.
> >
> > Into what? Food! Through interlocking directors, at the time of this
> study,
> > Gulf was interlocked with General Foods and Ralston Purina; Mobil Oil
with
> > General Foods and H. J. Heinz; Standard of California with American
> Potato,
> > Basic Vegetable Products, and Broadway Hale Stores; Atlantic Richfield
Co.
> > with Lincoln County Livestock, and Diamond A Cattle; Philips Petroleum
> with
> > Campbell Soup; Citgo with Kraft and Campbell Soup; Getty Oil with A&P
and
> > Carnation; Standard Oil Of Ohio with National Biscuit; Hesslup with
> Borden;
> > Safeway is controlled by the Chase Manhattan Bank; Tenneco controlled at
> the
> > time of this report, approximately one and a half million acres of land,
> > gas, oil, and chemicals; IT&T is interlocked with Wonderbread; Case
(farm
> > implements) and International Harvester are controlled by the
> Rockefeller's
> > and John Deere's president, at that time, a member of the Tri Lateral
> > Commission.
> >
> > Who was the biggest beef producer through feedlots and fatteners?
> Greyhound
> > bus! Who was the biggest pork producer in the world? Armour, owned by
> > Greyhound Bus! One of the largest cattle feeders by volume in the U.S.
as
> > well as one Of the largest grain companies is Cargill, (run by Whitney
> > McMillan, a Tri Lat member), and they bought Missouri Beef, one Of the
> > largest beef packing plants.
> >
> > Does the recent "collapse" of the U.S.S.R. tie into the New World
Order?
> > The plans to bring the Soviet Union into a one world government goes
back
> to
> > 1907. The very same people who established the Federal Reserve Act, the
> > graduated income tax, and the CFR also bankrolled the Bolshevik
> Revolution.
> > This was a well-known fact in intelligence circles at that time. In
1953,
> > CFR member H. Rowan Gaither (Chairman of Ford Foundation) made a
statement
> > to Norman Dodd (chief investigator for the special Congressional
Committee
> > to Investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations):
> >
> > "We shall use our grant-making power to SO alter life in the United
> States
> > that we can he comfortably merged with the Soviet Union."
> >
> > Consider the following excerpts from the Washington Post Weekly (May 4,
> > 1992) "The IMF [international monetary fund], the World Bank, and the
> major
> > industrial nations have decided to take a risk with Russia and former
> Soviet
> > Republics ... Russian Deputy Prime Minister Yegor Gaidar ... last week
> > swept through Washington, reassuring business leaders, as well as
finance
> > ministers and central bankers from the Group Of Seven major industrial
> > nations."
> >
> > "In an effort to get the banking system under control, Gerald Corrigan,
> the
> > President Of the New York Federal Reserve Bank (CFR/Tri Lat member), has
> > been visiting Moscow regularly since September 1991 to advise the
Central
> > bank and commercial banks. An acquaintance of former Fed Chairman Paul
A.
> > Volcker (CFR/Tri Lat member), Says Volcker is close to an agreement that
> > would make him consultant to Russian President Boris Yeltzin." "in
> addition,
> > David Rockefeller (CFR/Tri Lat mbr), a former Chairman of the Chase
> > Manhattan Bank, says he has agreed to be part of a group Corrigan is
> > assembling that might help establish banking business in Russia.
> >
> > "Once the IMF program is in place, the World bank will supply direct
> > support to the agriculture and oil sectors of the Russian economy." "The
> oil
> > sector is enough to solve any financial crisis they (the Russians) might
> > have", says World Bank President Lewis Preston (CFR & formerly with
Morgan
> > Guaranty). He says there are 33 undeveloped fields in W. Siberia."
> >
> > Isn't that interesting? The World Bank and the IMF, are "supporting"
the
> > agriculture and oil sectors thereby controlling the food and energy. It
> > would be more accurate to say that the CFR/Tri Lat Comm are controlling
> the
> > agriculture and oil sectors. Furthermore, the CFR/Tri Lat involvement in
> > Russia's central bank has recently (July 26, 1993) mandated a call-in of
> all
> > pre-1993 rubles, crippling the ability of the Russian citizen to provide
> for
> > his family. Not only does the U.S. taxpayer underwrite about 34% of the
> IMF
> > and World Bank funding, but the afore-mentioned "G-7" central bankers
are
> > also stockholders in our Federal Reserve!
> >
> > Yeltzin [it is now time for Putin to get in on the gravy since Yeltzin
is
> > retiring] was working closely with the CFR/Tri Lat - what about
Gorbachev?
> A
> > transcript of Gorbachev's May 6, 1992 speech given at Westminster
College
> > follows. On page 9 he states: "However, even now, at a time of sharply
> > increased interdependence in the world, many countries are morbidly
> jealous
> > of their sovereignty, many peoples of their national independence and
> > identity! [no kidding!] This is one of the newest global
contradictions,
> > one which must be overcome by joint effort." (Speech May 6, 1992,
> > Westminster College, "The River of Time and the Imperative of Action" pg
> 9,
> > by Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev.)
> >
> > In Vancouver earlier this year, President Clinton promised Yeltzin $1.6
> > Billion dollars in direct assistance, in addition to the billions
promised
> > by the G-7 (which also includes the USA); yet most Americans have no
idea
> as
> > to how long and how much Western aid and trade has gone into the USSR
> since
> > 1917.
> > 1) After the Bolshevik Revolution, Standard Oil of New Jersey
> (Rockefeller)
> > bought 50% of Nobel's huge Caucasus oil fields;
> > 2) In 1927, Standard Oil of New York (Rockefeller) built a refinery in
> > Russia;
> > 3) In 1928, Rockefeller's Chase Bank was involved in selling Bolshevik
> > Bonds in the U.S. - patriotic organizations denounced Chase as an
> > "international fence".
> >
> > (Have we forgotten the hundreds of millions (total still unknown by
> > Congress) that the Democratic Congress, (as promised by the new
President
> > Clinton to President Yeltzin), gave, in individual grants, yes Grants,
to
> > each Russian Officer ($25,000 each) who would go back to Russia to live
> > because Yeltzin said he had no place to put them? Have we forgotten
that
> > Yeltzin immediately promoted over 300,000 top ranking enlisted personnel
> to
> > officers rank so that they could get some of the largesse from the
> Taxpayers
> > of The USA?)) (Senator Jesse Helms, Senate Foreign Relations Committee,
> Ph:
> > 202-224-4651, Fax: 202-224-0836).
> >
> > In the Congressional Record of June 15, 1933, Congressman Louis
McFadden
> > said:
> >
> > "The Soviet government has been given U.S. Treasury funds by the
Federal
> > Reserve Banks acting through the Chase Bank and Morgan Guaranty Trust
Co.
> > and other banks in New York City... Open up the books of Amtorg, the
> trading
> > organization of the Soviet government in New York, and of Gostorg, the
> > general office of the Soviet Trade Organization, and the State Bank of
the
> > U.S.S.R. and you will he staggered to see how much American money has
been
> > taken from the U.S. Treasury for the benefit of Russia. Find out what
> > business has been transacted for the State Bank of Soviet Russia by its
> > correspondent, the Chase Bank of New York".
> >
> > It is important to note that Congressman McFadden shortly thereafter
died
> > under "mysterious circumstances", cause was left undetermined by the
> > "authorities".
> >
> > The following information is derived from Antony Sutton's comprehensive
> > book "Best Enemy Money Can Buy", (by Antony Sutton, 1986, Liberty House
> > Press, 2027 Iris Ln., Billings, Montana 59102). Sutton is acknowledged
as
> > the foremost expert on western technology and Soviet economic
development.
> >
> > He was a research fellow at the Hoover Institute On War & Peace; and
> > therefore had access to information most researchers outside
establishment
> > circles were denied. Revealing this information cost him his job. Sutton
> > documents that:
> > 1) Ford set up the Gorki vehicle plant in 1929, upgraded by the
> Lend-Lease
> > programs of WW II; vehicles produced in this plant were used against
U.S.
> > troops in Korea and Vietnam;
> > 2) The Soviet tank industry began in 1929 under the guise of producing
> > tread-type tractors; The Stalingrad plant was entirely constructed in
the
> > U.S., dismantled, and re-erected in the U.S.S.R. by American engineers.
> This
> > was just one of several which utilized American machine tools and
> equipment;
> > 3) In 1946, the Soviets bought 55 Rolls Royce turbo-jet engines from
> Great
> > Britain, and reproduced them in quantity on American and German machine
> > tools. These engines powered the MiG-15 fighters, used against our F-86
> > Sabre jets in Korea;
> > 4) 37 of the 96 Soviet ships regularly employed on the "Haiphong Run"
> > during the Vietnam War (keeping North Vietnam supplied) used diesel
> engines
> > of western origin. The missile-carrying Soviet ships of the 1962 Cuban
> > Missile Crisis were propelled by engines produced in Denmark-a NATO
ally;
> > 5) From 1960 until 1972, the Soviets sought acquisition of a
specialized
> > machine tool manufactured by the Bryant Chucking Company of Springfield,
> > Vermont. This machine, the "Centalign B", produced high-precision
> miniature
> > ball bearings, supplying 85% of its output to the U.S. defense industry
> for
> > guidance systems in our missiles. Under President Nixon and National
> > Security Advisor Henry Kissinger, approval was given in 1972 to export
164
> > of these machines to the U.S.S.R. By 1974, the Soviets had MIRV'D their
> > ICBMS. This was made public on March 8, 1983 by Secretary of Defense
> Casper
> > Weinberger, stating that the greatly improved accuracy of Soviet
missiles
> > was derived from U.S. technology;
> > 6) In the 70's, the Kama River truck plant was built in the Soviet
Union.
> > It covers 36 square miles and can produce 100,000 multiaxle 10-ton
> > trucks/year. 75% of the equipment and technology is from the U.S.; 25%
is
> > Italian and European, including European subsidiaries of U.S. companies.
> > American taxpayers underwrote the Kama River financing through the
> > Export/Import Bank. Chase Manhattan (Rockefeller was the lead financier.
> It
> > was built by the Pullman-Swindell Co. (a subsidiary of M.W. Kellogg Co.)
> of
> > Pittsburgh;
> > 7) The Volgograd automobile plant, built 1968-1971, has a capacity of
> > 600,000 vehicles/year. Three-fourths of the equipment were of U.S.
> > manufacture, including key transfer lines and automated tools. The
> > construction contract was awarded to Fiat S.P.A., a firm closely
> associated
> > with the Chase Manhattan Bank;
> > 8) The 647 mile highway which connects the U.S.S.R. with Kabul,
> Afghanistan
> > was under construction in 1966, built with Soviet money and U.S. foreign
> aid
> > money. A 67 mile stretch of road through the Salang Pass cost $42
million,
> > prompting a U.S. engineer to say it was the costliest section of road he
> had
> > ever seen. This highway felt the rumble of Soviet tanks, heavy trucks,
and
> > military vehicles (many produced with American equipment and money) in
> > December, 1979 when the Soviets invaded Afghanistan. The results -over
one
> > million casualties. Richard F. Starr, a former U.S. Ambassador, has said
> > that the former Soviet Union has stored at least 362 million metric tons
> of
> > grain (much of it from the West), in fallout shelters. These supplies,
> > according to University of N. Carolina economist Steven Rosefield, could
> > feed the entire population of the former U.S.S.R. for 3-4 years. In
> > addition, there are reserves in 87 cities throughout the U.S.S.R. giving
> > them total reserves in excess of 5 years.
> >
> > By contrast, the U.S. has 30-45 days of reserves. These Soviet
reserves,
> > given to them by the U.S through credits with deferred payments, are
being
> > paid for by the U.S. taxpayer. Senator Malcom Wallop (R-Wy.) pointed out
> > that Soviet indebtedness is estimated to be at least $100 billion and
that
> > Western loans to Soviet banks located in the West are not included in
that
> > figure; 80% of these loans are "untied", not restricted to any program
or
> > project. As of 1990, $700 million a month were being loaned to the
Soviet
> > government. In the meantime, the U.S. has spent billions in defense
> budgets
> > to protect us from those who are recipients of not only loans and
credits,
> > but our technology as well! ("Best Enemy Money Can Buy" contains
Appendix
> F:
> > "U.S. firms trading with the Soviet Union in the 1960-1986 period, pages
> > 231-235).
> >
> > David Funderburk, a former Ambassador to Romania under the Reagan
> > Administration, stepped down from his post in protest of U.S. policy
> toward
> > Communist Romania and Eastern Europe. In his book, "Betrayal of
America",
> he
> > documents the collaboration between the leadership elite of the State
> > Department and the Communist countries:
> >
> > "We're propping up Communist regimes which are bankrupt and would fall
> > without our aid..aid from the U.S. government, from big business, and
from
> > big banks in America..." (Betrayal of America" by David B. Funderburk,
> > former U.S. Ambassador to Romania, 1991, Dist. by Betrayal of America,
> P.O.
> > Box 1124, Durham, N. Carolina 28334).
> >
> > In his book, "Reminiscences", John D. Rockefeller informs us "One of
our
> > greatest helpers has been the State Department in Washington. Our
> > ambassadors, and ministers, and consuls have aided to push our way into
> new
> > markets to the utmost corners of the world."
> >
> > Is it any wonder? The CFR has dominated the State Department since WW
II.
> >
> > Why don't we hear about these things from the media? At the 1991
> > Bilderbergers'(European-based globalists) meeting in Baden-Baden,
Germany,
> > the opening speaker was David Rockefeller. He said this:
> >
> > "We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time
> magazine,
> > and other publications whose directors have attended our meetings, and
> > respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years ... It would
> have
> > been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been
> > subject to the bright lights of publicity during these years."
> >
> > Who was among the invited guests? Bill Clinton and Dan Quayle.
> >
> > Among the communication corporations represented in the CFR/Tri Lat
Comm
> > are these:
> > 1. CBS
> > 2. NBC
> > 3. ABC
> > 4. PBS
> > 5. CNN
> > 6. Washington Post
> > 7. New York Times Co.
> > 8. Wall Street Journal
> > 9. Newsweek
> > 1O. U.S. News and World Report
> > 11. Time, Inc
> > 12. Associated Press and Reuters (both of which local newspapers rely
> upon)
> > (Look at your newspapers and see who controls the news that you get
via
> > that newspaper...it is AP!...switch your NBC/CBS/ABC news channels back
> and
> > forth each day you watch them and you will see that all three espouse
the
> > same story, virtually word for word).
> >
> > CFR members who are TV news personalities include-
> > 1. Dan Rather
> > 2. Tom Brokaw
> > 3. David Brinkley
> > 4. John Chancellor
> > S. Barbara Walters
> > 6. Diane Sawyer
> > 7. Robert NcNeil
> > 8. Jim Lehrer
> > 9. Daniel Schorr
> > 10.Roone Arledge
> >
> > David Brinkley (CFR), to a meeting of the American TV/Radio
Broadcasters
> > Association, said this of the American people:
> >
> > "All they know about public policy is what we tell them." Sadly
enough -
> > true.
> >
> > Scripture warns us about ignorance. Hosea 4:6 "My people are destroyed
> from
> > a lack of knowledge." Public ignorance and apathy are allies of the
> > globalists, and only recently have we heard the brazen call for a New
> World
> > Order from (Ex)-President Bush, from his son Texas Gov G W Bush
> > (presidential wannabe), from VP Al (A for Alpha male) Gore. Yet this
> phrase
> > is nothing new - It has been on the back of a one dollar bill since
1935.
> >
> > Under the pyramids the Latin phrase "Novus Ordo Seclortim", which means
a
> > "new secular order of the age;" in other words, a new world order
without
> > God.
> >
> > The conspirators are confident of bringing in a one-world government,
> which
> > includes plans to scrap our Constitution. They have been quietly
acquiring
> > the necessary 34 states' approval to call up a Constitution Convention
> > (ConCon) in an effort to install a new constitution. ("New States of
> > America" from "The Emerging Constitution", by Rexford G. Tugwell, 1974,
> > Harper & Row). it is already written, and has been largely promoted by a
> > group called the "Committee on a Constitutional System" (C.C.S). 19 of
its
> > 51-member board of directors are also members of the CFR.
> >
> > C. Douglas Dill (CFR member, former Sec. Treasury) said: "Such a
> > significant shift in our Constitution is unlikely to come about except
as
> a
> > result of a crisis that is very grave indeed."
> >
> > A financial crisis today would further their goals just as it did in
> 1929.
> > Will the new "deficit reduction bill" help the country or hasten a
crisis?
> > The majority of the bill's spending cuts will not take place until the
> > President's term is over, in the meantime, over $800 million interest
each
> > and every day will be added to the debt. Will a balanced budget
amendment
> > (BBA) reign in the spending? Every BBA proposal in Washington today
would
> > allow Congress to overrule any such amendment by a 60% vote. If Congress
> was
> > sincere, a simple majority vote in the House (218) and the Senate (51)
> would
> > balance the budget.
> >
> > Remember, the country is still bankrupt; furthermore, the Secretary of
> the
> > Treasury is also the Governor of the International Monetary Fund (IMF)
> This
> > is an alien/foreign financial institution (22 U.S.Code 286). What does
> this
> > mean? Look on the back of any returned check you mailed to the IRS for
> > federal taxes since 1976: you will find that it has been endorsed by a
> > Federal Reserve Bank. Remember who owns the Fed?
> >
> > Your tax payment was allowed to go right out of the country!
> >
> > 100% of your tax money goes to pay the interest on the national debt.
> None
> > goes to running the government or providing any of the services we "have
> > come to expect".
> >
> > The definition of the national debt means all obligations owed by the
> > Treasury Department to its creditors-i.e., the international bankers,
> > savings bonds, treasury bonds, etc.
> >
> > The real motive behind a balanced budget amendment is not to reign in
> > spending, but to adopt a new Constitution.
> >
> > How close are they? They have 32 of the required 34 states in
agreement.
> > The American public got duped into the Federal Reserve Act and the 16th
> > Amendment. Would it be any different now?
> >
> > Hosea 4:6: "My people are destroyed from a lack of knowledge."
> >
> > A number of things could precipitate a crisis, and like in 1929, could
> > bring about a run on the banks. The President could invoke "Emergency
> > Banking Regulation No. 1", which would restrict your right to withdraw
on
> > your bank account, and "...prohibit withdrawals of cash in any case ...
> that
> > such withdrawal is sought for the purpose of hoarding."
> >
> > The following Executive Orders were combined by Richard Nixon into E.O.
> > No.11490, which activates all of the following under national emergency
> > conditions:
> > EO 10995 provides for the control of the communications media
> > EO 10997 provides for the control of the power, fuels, and minerals
> > EO 10998 provides for the control of all food and farms
> > EO 10999 provides for the control of all transportation, highways, etc.
> > EO 11000 provides for the mobilization of all civilians into work
> brigades
> > under government supervision
> > EO 11001 provides for control of all health, education, and welfare
> > EO 11002 designates the postmaster to operate a national registration
of
> > all persons
> > EO 11003 provides for control of all airports and aircraft
> > EO 11004 provides for relocation of any populations
> > EO 11005 provides for control of railroads, waterways, and public
storage
> > facilities
> >
> > A one-world government would require a world law, a world court, and
for
> > enforcement, a world army. You can understand why our Constitution must
be
> > scrapped, because Article 1, Section 8, clauses 13-16 gives Congress
> > exclusive power over our armed forces. Witness the current drive for
> > establishment and membership in the proposed International Criminal
Court,
> > managed, controlled, and directed by the UN!
> >
> > The sovereignty of our nation depends upon its ability to defend
> itself...
> > Period. What provisions would place our armed forces under a one-world
> > government? In Volume 9, of the 25 Volume set of the 1982 United States
> > Code, on pages 554-558, you will find Public Law 87-297, which calls for
> the
> > disarmament of the U.S.
> >
> > This has been in force since 1961. This is further explained in "The
> > Blueprint for Peace Race" as "Publication No. 4, General Series 3"
> published
> > by the U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, May, 1962. An abridged
> > version of this is State Department Document 7277. (Department of State,
> > Disarmament Series 5, released September 1961, Office of Public
Services,
> > Bureau of Public Affairs, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington,
> D.C.)
> > The armed forces of this country are to be, in three phases, placed
under
> > the U.N. Undersecretary for Political and Security Council Affairs. We
are
> > in phase 2 right now.
> >
> > This position has always overseen all U.N. military operations since
> > 1946-it has also been held by a Soviet communist this entire time
(except
> > 1954-1957, held by a communist from Yugoslavia). At the present, our
> troops
> > in most overseas "peace keeping" hot spots serve under Turkey, Finland,
> > Germany, and Belgium commanders who answer directly to Russian U.N.
> > Undersecretary for Political and Security Council Affairs (although the
> > "Security Council" tag has been dropped, it is still his
responsibility).
> >
> > The American public is being warmed up to the idea of U.S. troops
serving
> a
> > foreign flag, under the auspices of "humanitarian assistance."
> Furthermore,
> > the disarmament plan has provisions to permanently station foreign U.N.
> > troops in our closed military bases, for "training". Of course, the
media
> > will tell us how much this will help the local economies. At the end of
> > phase 2 (of 3 phases), one half of our armed forces are placed under UN
> > control, and where possible, citizen-owned guns banned, hence the myth
> that
> > gun control is crime control. What they don't say is that, under a one
> world
> > government, all populations must be disarmed. In this country names
would
> be
> > collected from registration forms required by the 1968 Gun Control Act
> > (which is patterned from the 1938 Nazi "Law on Weapons"). Why would the
> > military leadership of this country, sworn to defend it, allow the armed
> > forces to be placed under a U.N. flag?
> >
> > CFR members, Defense Department
> > 1. Sec. Defense Les Aspin (Now W. Cohen)
> > 2. Undersec. for Policy Frank G. Wisner
> > 3. Asst. Sec. lnternational Security Affairs Henry S. Rowen
> > 4. Deputy Asst. Sec. Nuclear Fcs./Arms Control Frank C. Miller
> > 5. Deputy Asst. Sec. Europe and NATO W. Bruce Weinrod
> > 6. Chmn. Defense Policy Bd. Adm. Seymour Weiss
> > 7. Sec. Army Michael P.W. Stone
> > 8. Sec. Air Force Donald B. Rice
> >
> > CFR members, Joint Chiefs of Staff
> > 1. Chairman, Organization of The Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Colin
Powell
> > (Now retired).(Genl Powell said the following: "We did just what the UN
> > ordered [in Desert Storm] and stopped just short of Baghdad". The Larry
> King
> > TV show, 29 January 2000.
> > 2. Army Gen. Carl E. Vuono
> > 3. CO Pac AF Gen. Merrill A. McPeak
> > 4. Dir. Strat. Plans/Policy Lt. Gen. George L. Butler
> > 5. Comdr., Air Univ Lt. Gen. Charles T. Boyd
> > 6. AF Inspector Gen. Lt. Gen. Bradley C. Hosmer
> > 7. Army Gen John M Shalikashvili Chief of Staff (retired)
> >
> > CFR members, past Sec. of Defense CFR members, past Allied Supreme
> > Commanders
> > 1. 1957-59 McElroy 1949-52 Eisenliower
> > 2. 1959-61 Gates 1952-53 Ridgeway
> > 3. 1961-63 McNamara 1953-56 Gruenther
> > 4. 1969-73 Laird 1956-63 Norstad
> > 5. 1973 Richardson 1963-69 Lemnitzer
> > 6. 1975-77 Rumsfeld 1969-74 Goodpaster
> > 7. 1977-81 Brown 1974-79 Haig
> > 8. 1981-87 Weinberger 1979-87 Rogers
> > 9. 1987-89 Carlucci
> > 10.1989-93 Cheney II. 1993- Aspin
> >
> > There are, however, many in our armed forces who are patriotic to this
> > nation. Pray for them. We need them so desperately.
> >
> > The following current presidential candidates are confirmed as NOT
being
> a
> > member of either: The CFR or The Tri Lateral Comm: Alan Keyes Republican
> > Party; Patrick Buchanan Reform Party; Steve Forbes Republican Party; Sen
> > Orrin Hatch Republican (withdrawn); Gary Bauer Republican (withdrawn).
> >
> > The following current presidential candidates are confirmed as being a
> > member of:
> > John McCain Republican Council on Foreign Relations; VP Al (the Alpha
> Male)
> > Gore Democrat Council on Foreign Relations; Bill Bradley Democrat
Council
> on
> > Foreign Relations.
> >
> > The following current presidential candidates are unknown even after
> being
> > asked by E-mail, Letter, Faxes, and Telephone Calls: Texas Governor G.
W.
> > Bush Republican Party No Response at all.(his father is and has been
> > Director of the CFR for several years, so it is likely that he is also).
> >
> > As James Madison warned, there has been a:
> >
> > "silent and gradual encroachment of those in power."
> >
> > "Dead in Kosovo Exaggerated. Despite Administration claims last spring,
> the
> > number of ethnic Albanians killed by Serbs in Kosovo never approached
> > "genocide." Implications that 100,000+ civilians were murdered are
> > groundless, investigators now say. According to Spanish pathologist
> Emilio
> > Perez Pujol, head of a team of investigators, "I calculate that the
final
> > figure of dead in Kosovo will be 2,500 at the most." Critics say the
> > inflated numbers were used to justify U.S. Military intervention." (The
> VFW
> > Magazine, Page 8, January 2000). This war was created in order to
further
> > enhance the impression upon the American people that we must become the
> > world's policemen, and guess what, under the umbrella of the "good ole
> UN".
> > With NATO being part of the UN it is easy to convince the people that
NATO
> > was right in attacking Yugoslavia...Just another ploy to "dig our graves
> > deeper" into the UN fold. It was also used to direct attention away from
> > other problems snapping at the heels of the current administration at
> home!
> > All with the assistance of the news media, members of the CFR.
> >
> > We are on the verge of "global tyranny", as Jasper so aptly states.
> >
> > We are a Constitutional Republic, steeped in Christian heritage and
> > guaranteed certain God-given inalienable rights. I will repeat this
again:
> > we have God-given rights - we are accountable to Him for everything,
> > including our liberty and freedom. Our rights carry responsibilities. To
> > dismiss those responsibilities is a sin of omission, no different than a
> sin
> > of commission - God detests both.
> >
> > Proverbs 13:22 says: "A good man leaves an inheritance to his
children's
> > children."
> >
> > Over 957,000 patriotic Americans have given their lives in defense of
our
> > country. Their legacy is the freedom and liberty we now have. We are
their
> > posterity. Don't let their sacrifice become in vain. Although we are not
> on
> > the battlefields of France, or an atoll in the Pacific, or a hill in
> Korea,
> > or a jungle in Vietnam, or even a desert in Saudi Arabia, we are indeed
> > engaged in a battle. That battlefield is in America. A war is being
waged
> > against God, country, and family. Why? We are not only the last bastion
of
> > freedom, but 85% of the Great Commission (Mt. 28:19, 20) emanates from
> > America. What can we do?
> >
> > 1) Become informed, not misinformed. You know whose camp the major
media
> is
> > in - and it's not in yours. The best publication I know of for becoming
> > informed is "The New American" magazine, a bi-weekly publication written
> by
> > people who embrace the same ideals as our Founders (P.O. Box 8040,
> Appleton,
> > Wisconsin 54913, 1-800-341-1522),
> > 2) Pray for your elected representative - many have forgotten what
> > "representative" means. Voice your concerns to them - but do so from a
> > perspective of knowledge and insight. There are many groups who address
> the
> > effects - but have no insight as to the cause.
> > 3) Are you one of those people who say, "I don't know where the money
> > goes - it costs twice as much to live beyond my means as it use to"? If
> you
> > live by the world system, you will be subjugated by the same.
> >
> > Alexis De Tocqueville, in 1840, made the following observation after
his
> > years long tour of throughout America:
> >
> > "I sought for the key to the greatness and genius of America in her
> > harbours...; in her fertile fields and boundless forests; in her rich
> mines
> > and vast world commerce; in her public school system and institutions of
> > higher learning. I sought for it in her democratic Congress and in her
> > matchless Constitution. Not until I went into the churches of America
and
> > heard her pulpits flame with righteousness did I understand the secret
of
> > her genius and power. America is great because America is good, and if
> > America ever ceases to be good, America will cease to be great."
> >
> > (He was especially impressed with the Hospitality, manners, decorum,
> sense
> > of duty, of Honour, and Responsibility consistently evident in what was
> > identified to him as the Southern States).
> >
> > NOTE: This document is in the process of being updated as rapidly as I
can
> > collect the information needed to do so. The stated goal of the Council
on
> > Foreign Relations of which so many of our elected officials are members
is
> > to totally subjugate this country and all others, AFTER us, to the total
> > communistic style dictatorship of the UN! However, the UN has one very
> > large stumbling block in its way...Our Constitution and especially the
2nd
> > amendment to it....The CFR has historically stated that it would have
> total,
> > repeat total, control by the end of the year 2000! That is why there is
> > such a flurry of anti-2nd amendment activity and assignment of military
> > troops under foreign commanders, overseas, by the current
administration,
> > and by activity in the General Assembly of the UN. The US Military
Forces
> > have been reduced to less than 50% of what it was prior to 1992. WHY?
> Total
> > disarmament of all citizens of the United States including law
enforcement
> > officials is their openly stated goal. The only personnel within the
> United
> > States who will have any firearms of any type will be the military,
which
> > will be totally under the control of the UN. We must save our Nation,
our
> > Constitution, our God Given rights, our sovereign nation from becoming
> just
> > another slave state under the UN! And, can you guess why the individual
> > members of the Armed Forces of the US have been asked to certify that
they
> > will or will not fire upon American Citizens if called upon to do so?
What
> > is your guess?
> >
> > Before you vote for anyone, find out where their money is coming
> > from....find out if they are a member of the CFR and/or the TLC...If
they
> > are and you vote for them you are voting for communism, UN STYLE, one
> world
> > government, one world governor, the Sec Gen'l, of the United Nations!
> >
> > Information Sources:1. The New American Magazine (many years of issues),
> POB
> > 8040, Appleton, Wisconsin. 54912-9895.
> > 2. Global Tyrany..Step by Step, by William F Jasper. American
Opinion
> > Book Services, POB 8040, Appleton, Wisconsin. 54912-9895.
> > 3. The National Archives, Washington, DC.
> > 4. Senator Jesse Helms, US Senate, Washington, DC.
> > 5. Numerous other periodicals, such as Human Events, The Citizens
> > Informer, The Washington Times, and others.
> > 6. The National Congressional Records Depository, Shepherd College,
> > Shepherdstown, W.Va.
> > 7. Documents referred to within the above text.
> > 8. The Holy Bible!
> > 9. The Library of Congress, Washington, DC.
> > 10. The Federal Register, same as 6.
> > 11. The Constitution of The United States.
> > 12. The Declaration of Independence.
> > 13. The Federalist Papers.
> > 14. The VFW Magazine (several years of issues).
> > 15. The National Congressional Records Depository, Lake Sumpter Jr
> > College, Leesburg, Lake Co, Florida.
> > 16. The 1999 Membership Roster of The Council on Foreign Relations.
> > 17. The 1999 Annual Report, the Council on Foreign Relations.
> > 18. The 1997 Report of the Annual Meeting of the Tri Lateral
Commission
> > in Tokyo, Japan.
> > 19. The Jan 2000 Membership List of the Tri Lat Comm.
> > Chester L McWhorter Sr
> > 504 N. Brighton Rd
> > Lecanto, Florida. 34461.